Published on:

By

Opening statements in the criminal trial of Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, the former portfolio managers for the Bear Stearns High Grade Funds, start today in federal court in Brooklyn, NY. The High Grade Funds imploded in 2007 causing $1.4 billion in investor losses. Prosecutors have charged Cioffi and Tannin with securities fraud and Cioffi with insider trading. The media coverage so far has focused almost exclusively on emails sent by Cioffi and Tannin regarding their personal thoughts about the Funds. The government alleges that Cioffi and Tannin thought the Funds were in serious trouble but then told investors on conference calls that everything was fine. While emails are often sexy and this is an important part of the case, the defense will likely argue that the email quotes were taken out of context and that the portfolio managers were simply analyzing the prospects of the Funds and were not intentionally lying to investors.

The press has not focused much on two just as important aspects of the prosecution’s case which should be easier to prove. First, according to the prosecutors, on the investor conference calls, the managers told investors that there was a lesser amount of investor redemptions in the High Grade Funds than there actually were. Here, the government can argue that Cioffi and Tannin clearly knew how much in redemptions were put in by investors yet they told investors a different number so investors wouldn’t run for the exits. The redemption amounts are undisputed facts and much less susceptible to defense spinning.

Second, the prosecutors allege that Cioffi and Tannin used their personal investments in the Funds as part of their pitch to investors, to invest in, and stay invested in the Funds. In early 2007, the government alleges Tannin told investors he was adding to his position. Also, Cioffi redeemed $2 million of his own personal monies in 2007 and did not notify investors. The government can argue that Tannin lied to investors about his own personal investments in order to keep them in the Funds. Also, that Cioffi, because he used his own personal investments in the Funds as a marketing tool, wilfully omitted his $2 million personal redemption in order to induce investors to stay in the Funds. The longer the Funds were alive, the better chance Cioffi and Tannin could continue to reap their multi million dollar annual bonuses.

Published on:

By

Matthew Tannin, the former Bear Stearns High Grade Fund portfolio manager, kept a personal diary of e-mails to himself in a G-Mail account. The U.S. Attorney’s Office received the e-mails after using a search warrant on Google. According to e-mails released by prosecutors yesterday, Tannin wrote in as early as November 2006 that the funds “could blow up”. U.S. District Judge Frederic Block said at a hearing that he will likely allow prosecutors to introduce the newly obtained e-mails as evidence at Tannin’s trial. The U.S. Attorney’s Office apparently has not finished reviewing all of the e-mails.

These e-mails could be extremely helpful in the government’s case against Tannin. His trial is set for Oct. 13. The prosecutors can use Tannin’s e-mails to show his knowledge and intent that Tannin and a co-defendant Ralph Cioffi misled clients about the funds.

The e-mails may also be helpful for the many investors who have pending securities arbitration cases against Bear Stearns (our firm has multiple, significant arbitrations pending at FINRA). Since the notebook and Tablet PC of Cioffi and Tannin have gone missing, Tannin’s newly discovered personal e-mail diary may be investors only chance to look into Tannin’s thoughts regarding the funds.

Published on:

By

Floyd Norris of the New York Times has a piece in today’s paper about the legal hurdles facing plaintiffs in court actions related to auction rate securities. He writes about the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) pleading requirements when filing a fraud claim in a securities litigation. A plaintiff must allege very specific allegations of fraud or risk getting tossed out on a pre-trial motion dismiss. Tough hurdle.

Luckily, most of the auction rate securities cases have been filed as arbitrations at FINRA. The PSLRA pleading requirements do not apply. And there is a very small chance that a claimant in a FINRA arbitration will have his case knocked out by a pre-hearing motion to dismiss because FINRA recently changed its rules severely limiting the grounds to file such a motion.

The upshot is that if you’re an investor, whether retail or institutional, and you’re stuck holding an auction rate security that was misrepresented to you as a cash equivalent, your best bet is to file an arbitration at FINRA. It’s private, less costly than a court litigation, and should resolve between 12 and 18 months. We represent auction rate investors worldwide. Also, PIABA, a bar association of attorneys who specialize in representing investors, is a good place to find counsel. The auction rate securities fiasco has been a huge burden on small and large conservative investors. Securities arbitration seems to be the only intelligent solution.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) censured two Dresdner Kleinwort bond traders for market abuse. Darren Morton, a director, and Christopher Parry, a vice-president, were charged with committing market abuse in relation to a new issue of Barclays’ bonds. According to the FSA, Mr. Morton and Mr. Parry were portfolio managers with K2, a Dresdner structured investment vehicle (SIV) that held $65 million worth of Barclays floating rate note bonds in its book. The FSA alleged that the traders received inside information about a potential new issue of Barclays FRNs with better terms than the previous issue, and then sold the SIV’s entire position to two separate counterparties which had no knowledge of the inside information. The counterparties suffered mark to market losses of $66,000 and later complained to K2. It is very encouraging to see the FSA step up its investigative pressure on improper behavior in the UK markets. Sure its only a censure and not a fine or permanent ban but we feel this is the beginning of a very tough regulatory environment in the City and on the Street.

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Charles Schwab has been trying most of the many arbitration cases filed against it related to the Charles Schwab HighYield Plus fund. Last month, a Los Angeles based Finra panel awarded what appears to be almost 100% of an investor’s losses (about $75,000) in the fund, plus expert witness fees and all of the arbitrators compensation. The case is Chang v. Charles Schwab (Finra case number 08-02417) and is available on Finra’s website. This is one of a string of recent losses in the HighYield Plus fund cases based upon allegations that the fund was overconcentrated in mortgage backed securities. It will be interesting to see if Schwab starts settling more of these cases.

Published on:

By

The Bear Stearns High Grade Funds blew up in the early summer of 2007, precipitating the the credit crisis around the world. On October 13, 2009, in federal court in Brooklyn, NY, Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, the portfolio managers of the High Grade Funds, will be facing criminal trial on fraud and conspiracy charges. Cioffi has also been charged with insider trading. This is the first major criminal trial stemming from the subprime mortgage era. It will be closely watched around the world. The U.S. Attorneys’ Office of the Eastern District of New York recently won a huge trial against former Credit Suisse broker Eric Butler who was convicted of fraudulently selling millions of dollars of auction rate securities. The Brooklyn jury convicted Butler of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud and he faces a maximum sentence of 45 years in prison. A major battle is being fought over whether the prosecutors can introduce evidence that a Tablet PC and a notebook of Cioffi and Tannin disappeared and about Cioffi’s lavish lifestyle.

Published on:

By

4,991securities arbitration cases have been filed at FINRA this year as of the end of August 2009. That is a 65% increase from 2008. Based upon our firm’s case log and speaking with other attorneys who represent investors in securities arbitrations, I expect the numbers to increase even more by year end. The dramatic drop in the securities markets in 2008 and 2009 exposed some dubious behavior, including the misrepresentation of bond funds as low risk (ie Morgan Keegan, Citigroup MAT and Falcon, Schwab Yield Plus). Also, structured products, such as the Lehman Brothers Structured Notes sold by UBS, were pitched as safe alternatives to bonds and imploded causing many arbitration claims. The increase in case filings in 2008 and 2009 is the first big spike in filings since the 2001 through 2003 time period after the tech market collapsed. New case filings reached almost 9,000 in 2003. Many inexperienced attorneys jumped into the securities arbitration practice area after the tech bubble and got clobbered by savvy defense counsel. With the Madoff and Stanford scandals generating so much attention to the investment fraud area, we’ll see if it happens again in this cycle.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Regions Morgan Keegan lost its biggest arbitration award to date related to its mutual funds which imploded during the subprime crisis. Former NBA ballplayer Horace Grant won an almost $1.5 million arbitration award against Morgan Keegan & Co. for losses in the bond mutual funds. The Los Angeles based Finra panel awarded Mr. Grant almost all of his losses in the case. It was a very impressive victory considering how difficult it is to win arbitrations on behalf of athletes or celebrities. Regions Morgan Keegan faces hundreds of arbitration claims filed by investors (including some represented by our firm) who allege that the funds were fraudulently marketed as conservative. After winning the first few rounds of cases, investors’ attorneys have started to routinely defeat the bank.

By
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

Citigroup suffered its first loss in an arbitration related to its MAT fund. A FINRA arbitration panel in Miami, FL awarded a claimant $250,000 plus interest accruing from March 1, 2009 until the award is paid. The arbitration hearing took place over four days in July and is reportedly the first arbitration award against Citigroup handled by a PIABA attorney concerning the MAT funds. In 2008, Citigroup’s proprietary investment funds under the trade name ASTA, MAT and Falcon blew up in spectacular fashion. Citigroup presently faces numerous customer arbitrations (including some filed by our firm) related to the funds. It had won its first two reported arbitrations in Detroit and St. Louis.

Published on:

By

Finra filed an Investor Alert warning investors and reminding brokers and RIA’s that inverse ETF’s that offer leverage are very complex and are typically unsuitable for any retail investor who intends on holding them beyond one day.

Inverse ETF’s are designed to perform inversely to an index or a benchmark that they track. They can be useful in sophisticated trading strategies, but are very difficult for everyday investors to understand. The Investor Alert focuses on risk, cost and tax consequences. Here is a link to it: http://www.finra.org/Investors/ProtectYourself/InvestorAlerts/MutualFunds/P119778

By
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information